I will be making use of no hermeneutic, thank you greatly. We talk ancient greek language.

I will be making use of no hermeneutic, thank you greatly. We talk ancient greek language.

The passage in 1 Cor. Does NOT utilize identity-words, it makes use of action terms: “those who take, people who get drunk, people who revile, anyone who has intercourse with men”.

None of the are terms that basically refer to identity that is one’s in Greek. They refer to one’s actions.

Kathy, praise Jesus for the testimony which is great to hear which you’ve been aided right right here. We shall undoubtedly simply just take this under consideration whenever getting together with people related to SF.

But, taking a look at Daniel’s reactions (re: “I speak ancient Greek — therefore there’s exactly just just what 1 Cor. 6:9-11 says… that are‘really’. Just as if hot brunette sex no body else has ever examined those verses – or lived them! ), you might additionally be able understand why i will be extremely skeptical.

In addition, he hasn’t really addressed any of my concerns & he linked to an article about “divorce”, when my analogy was about adultery while I appreciate that Ron has engaged here.

Possibly, i will have drawn it away further: in cases where a married guy nevertheless experiences opposite gender attraction toward ladies who aren’t their spouse in a way for him to identify as an adulterous Christian that he is prone to fantasize about an adulterous affair, but he seeks help to battle the temptation, would it be proper? Needless to say maybe maybe not, unless apply the reasoning this website right right right here.

I’m happy for you personally, Kathy, and could not wish to accomplish or state such a thing to discourage you. My concern may be the authors in the site expect to be addressed as authorities mainly because an‘experience’ is had by them. Meanwhile, a good amount of us who’ve been walking into the light for a long time and that would never ever think about determining as homosexual are increasingly being thrown beneath the coach.

You truly appear to have no basic idea where I’m originating from, and also you assume i will be merely an apologist for many things gay. Either that, or perhaps you think I’m dishonest. I’m uncertain. If you’d love to comprehend more info on where I’m originating from, please glance at my feedback into the commentary area of the “What Not Means that is reducible prior to the post on SF. We don’t protect the proposal that “people with SSA should determine as gay”. I just think we must charitably tune in to why someone chooses to utilize a specific adjective. But i believe that both temptation and sin needs to be wholly refused.

Additionally, I’m simply puzzled by the dismissal that is apparent of commentary about “arsenokoitai”. I’m perhaps not exercising sophistry, if you may actually believe that i will be.

At the very least, Merry Xmas! Blessings in your Noel!

It’s all a bit messy, eh?. As in the future because it is uncomfortable for me these days, (too many memories) for myself i dont think I will be using the word gay to describe myself. Nonetheless, i might state i will be homosexual to let people understand we won’t be dating guys. I wish I really could explain more nonetheless it is xmas Eve! Enjoy your getaway, Jess, may comfort be to you and yours ??

Kathy and Daniel, i simply read your feedback right right here. Merry xmas to you both.

Ron: Why did you url to a write-up about breakup. Possibly, we had a need to draw it down further: if your married guy nevertheless experiences opposing intercourse attraction toward ladies who aren’t their wife in a way that he’s vulnerable to fantasize about an adulterous event, but he seeks help fight the urge, wouldn’t it be appropriate for him to recognize being an adulterous Christian? Needless to say maybe not. But making use of your reasoning, there is absolutely absolutely nothing incorrect along with it. I suppose someone ‘could’ use the phrase to spot on their own, however it’s very not likely that they’d be arguing that it’s somehow a very important thing or a basic thing. Possibly someone may wish to use this kind of expression because be considered a real method to be penitent for some time and also to remind them of the weakness, just like a scarlett page. But i am hoping you’d agree totally that this kind of label would likely never be regarded as good or neutral by anyone into the Christian church.

Jess, We have read your feedback right right here and also you run into a little aggressive. Maybe that’s not your intention, but become truthful the majority of what you’re arguing is just an argument that is tired those of us who’re part B have reviewed numerous, often times prior to.

I additionally discovered your dismissal of Daniel’s statements about I Corinthians and arsenokoitai to be odd. Exactly What he could be saying is certainly not revisionist. He could be offering a rendering that is accurate of Greek.

I would personally additionally simply simply simply take issue with a few of one’s theological language such as for instance having one foot when you look at the world and something when you look at the kingdom. Scripture says we’ve been moved through the dominion of Satan in to the dominion for the Son. That is clearly a complete deal. There’s absolutely no one foot within the kingdom and another foot away. Any Christian is completely into the kingdom. The real question is whether we have been acting in congruence with this founded citizenship. Or if perhaps we are gaining clothing from our old citizenship.

As ontological– I hear what you are saying for I corinthians being. But it addittionally makes presumptions that the autumn entirely obliterated what’s ontological therefore being created once more is some type of presence which includes no link with past existence that is human. I am maybe not also certain Reformed folk would state that simply because they acknowledge that the image of God had not been lost. Put another way, i might most likely place it more into the group of renovation for the pre-existing ontological suggest that was compromised yet not obliterated in each being that is human.

We don’t really want to enter into the argument re: why utilizing the expressed word gay is certainly not fine. That is discussing in a number of places about this weblog yet others right right here can approach it whether they have the psychological power. But, i shall just say that adultery is a tremendously reality that is different a person who’s got an unchosen, painful condition that renders life extremely tough. Adultery is chosen. Lust is selected. The healthiness of being homosexual is certainly not. Plus it does not make a difference it doesn’t change that person’s reality or cure them of their same-sex attraction if you play semantic games. I don’t usage “gay” as an identification nor do numerous at SF, but it is found by us useful to name our condition.

Also, the ex-gay motion had been misleading in its refusal to make use of the term gay, knowingly leading individuals to think that “I’m no more gay” implied that they no further had same-sex attraction. Utilizing that is“gay a descriptor is essential if you ask me in counteracting that deception.

We suspect that as your times in homosexual relationships ended up being twenty years ago and much more that element of this really is a gap that is generational. “Gay” had been a lot more of an identification and governmental marker then than it is currently. “Gay” isn’t the ditto as “gay. ”

But just why is it fair to express that when I’m a man whom struggles with other intercourse attraction to a lot of women that aren’t my real spouse, that my problem is relegated to 1 of easy choice, yet, if somebody struggles with exact same intercourse attraction, they truly are believed to have an ailment? With a this appears like a standard that is double but if you ask me it looks like a relevant point that features blinded many.

Sorry, if we come off aggressive, but let’s not imagine that Daniel’s so-called Greek argument about 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 wasn’t being circulated straight right straight back during my time also. We known their remark for instance of the way the “Side B” arguments here are actually absolutely nothing new underneath the sunlight; it is all been stated before. We don’t have actually my commentaries right in front of me personally, but an easy google search brought up this post containing some helpful tips in the topic: http: //six11. WordPress.com/2011/11/14/scripture-and-homosexuality-1corinthians/

©2024 FriendTips. Digital Project Management by Lumico.

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?